Congratulation on making it to your terrible two's.[updated link] I feel like a "birther" in having pushed your name and Ed's for MSNBC to match Faux News, although you match Comity* Central as well. In fact I almost admonished you for your "crossing the line", but I on second review of the rhetoric, it was not.** Here is to Bane or Change? You walk the line.
*SIC (spelling in Con/text)
** the Second Amendment Angle
[Third times a charm but not 'l's.(as in L's or spells)]
Chant... Bane(or)Change! Bane(or)Change! Bane(or)Change!
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query bane. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query bane. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, September 09, 2010
Sunday, January 08, 2012
A Shot in the Arm?
A collegue recently commented on the difficulty or the desire to be objective. This nails perspectivism on the head, or is it the cross? From neo-perspectivism through neo-nuanced and neo-platonic we do have a dynamic*** of global balance. More sorting later*. Thus spoke Niche?
* 1-9-12 correction (not two Chinas: two perspectives.)
BTW: Thus spoke Adam Smith.
D'Ribble[!] Which came first the crossroad or the chicken?**
Henwood/More? More's the Pity?
[On the other arm, a nemesis may have stubbed a tow(sic) on the plank the nail sticks out of.]
[Speaking of Ice, Thom Hartmann is in Iceland and provides some of the neo-perspectivism.]
** 1-10-12 link added (plural)
*** also maybe plural(see Hartmann/neo-relativism?) dynamics?
[edit notes: Ctrl F "the cart"]
[Also Ctrl F "Descartes" and the four horsemen?]
[Note: I have been lax in my boldness of links as an aid to navigation or sense of the thread. In that regard I finally bolded two.< now 3(!) > Also my asterisks and [brackets] are time relative or sensitive. i.e. to flow of the read. Now I will also note the relative flow of neo-platonic, neo-perspectivism, neo-liberal, neo-con, neo-nuanced and neo-relativism, not to end with six, name names or Ctrl F. BTW: Excuse me if I don't go to the trouble of flip-flopping the tetrahedron, that is the point.(Ctrl F "the people" and "the constitution".)]
[Speaking of a4 or timing, my 4a brought me another F, if not CF.(Note grammar, numbers, shapes, timing, etc.) F is TBA. Not to mention ? Nor Kidding. In closing (?)(!) Or too close to the 4close or Bane?]
[Third Bane's a charm? i.e. convention, congress, cain ? ]
[Speaking of Bane and Try Angles or Flip Romney and flopping it.
BTW: Under the Flip link there is an accounting or statistical trick that is not unknown to the debate. I won't play upon it, but it involves the "average tax cut" versus "the middle-income American." It is mathematical hyperbole as well as reasonable, where reality is even more confusing. It is more accurate to say that the richest are paying a lesser per cent of their gross (actual tax rate) than any other income category after the standard deductions and other taxes are accounted for.]
> previous post <
* 1-9-12 correction (not two Chinas: two perspectives.)
BTW: Thus spoke Adam Smith.
D'Ribble[!] Which came first the crossroad or the chicken?**
Henwood/More? More's the Pity?
[On the other arm, a nemesis may have stubbed a tow(sic) on the plank the nail sticks out of.]
[Speaking of Ice, Thom Hartmann is in Iceland and provides some of the neo-perspectivism.]
** 1-10-12 link added (plural)
*** also maybe plural(see Hartmann/neo-relativism?) dynamics?
[edit notes: Ctrl F "the cart"]
[Also Ctrl F "Descartes" and the four horsemen?]
[Speaking of a4 or timing, my 4a brought me another F, if not CF.(Note grammar, numbers, shapes, timing, etc.) F is TBA. Not to mention ? Nor Kidding. In closing (?)(!) Or too close to the 4close or Bane?]
[Third Bane's a charm? i.e. convention, congress, cain ? ]
[Speaking of Bane and Try Angles or Flip Romney and flopping it.
BTW: Under the Flip link there is an accounting or statistical trick that is not unknown to the debate. I won't play upon it, but it involves the "average tax cut" versus "the middle-income American." It is mathematical hyperbole as well as reasonable, where reality is even more confusing. It is more accurate to say that the richest are paying a lesser per cent of their gross (actual tax rate) than any other income category after the standard deductions and other taxes are accounted for.]
> previous post <
Thursday, January 03, 2013
Clog Alert!
Not to Ribble, but regarding two points here:
The tenor of Bane Or.
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)
A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.
Further parse N later ... [^]
^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ? w h ?
[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat" RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn? i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*
^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *
The tenor of Bane Or.
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)
A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.
Further parse N later ... [^]
^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ? w h ?
[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat" RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn? i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*
^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Bane and Company
"If we keep talking about the economy we will lose."
A more anachronistically correct quote was never said.
The sentence and yes I mean (bane and Company, Inc.)
It was actually said by Presidential candidate John McCain, about their campaign, and is exactly what will doom any Republican campaign. The Democrats will want to keep talking about the economy, as well as what the solutions are.
[My apologies*** for losing which major network noted* the Romney "quote"/ad. But later...]
* a search engine found these two links
[On another front: civil disobedience and** the blue line***.]
** (correction)/update
*** actually I have two...this is a tragedy that if true, begs the question. Which communities use lethal force for crowd control? Anyone with health concerns should be careful where they press their 1st amendment rights. Will there be accountability? Is it a federal concern, or based on community standards, or walking like an Egyptian. I am not advising the same pathology, but there is breaking news on that front.
*** third dimes a charm Who walks the line?
[Note the timing & *** which are recyled, and problematic: The asterisks are separated by my tangents and breaking news. There are two uses of the triple asterisks within the text, as well in footnote. This is an unhint of sorts. I wish I could bold a path.]
[The tragedy of the third footnote*** allows segue "On another front...": the line the law and military walk,(see drafts) for the people, and what makes us exceptional.]
[Now three in draft, including True Footnote.]
A more anachronistically correct quote was never said.
The sentence and yes I mean (bane and Company, Inc.)
It was actually said by Presidential candidate John McCain, about their campaign, and is exactly what will doom any Republican campaign. The Democrats will want to keep talking about the economy, as well as what the solutions are.
[My apologies*** for losing which major network noted* the Romney "quote"/ad. But later...]
* a search engine found these two links
[On another front: civil disobedience and** the blue line***.]
** (correction)/update
*** actually I have two...this is a tragedy that if true, begs the question. Which communities use lethal force for crowd control? Anyone with health concerns should be careful where they press their 1st amendment rights. Will there be accountability? Is it a federal concern, or based on community standards, or walking like an Egyptian. I am not advising the same pathology, but there is breaking news on that front.
*** third dimes a charm Who walks the line?
[Note the timing & *** which are recyled, and problematic: The asterisks are separated by my tangents and breaking news. There are two uses of the triple asterisks within the text, as well in footnote. This is an unhint of sorts. I wish I could bold a path.]
[The tragedy of the third footnote*** allows segue "On another front...": the line the law and military walk,(see drafts) for the people, and what makes us exceptional.]
[Now three in draft, including True Footnote.]
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Read or Ship?
Not fully sewn or C-sawed[!]
Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!] You got Ed!
Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?
Pardon the irony or mixed parody, which would you rather have, more Republican in the form of X, or Democracy in the form of Y? Still frackin’ about the Bane or poll-R-ization? AKA~
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .
Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!] You got Ed!
Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .
Friday, October 14, 2011
Legislation not politics!
[Can't Or Bane Or...]
(10-17-11 or change: added sub-heading with links only)
Was it Cant or Bane or, who said such.
Well, I paraphrase, but it was an attack on President Obama and the American Jobs Act. The idea that he was playing politics by giving them a jobs plan, while it is the legislature's job to create legislation. Sure there is a disagreement as to what creates jobs, but there should be no disagreement that it is legislation and it is political.
Plan B? Walking the Plank? Take up or down votes:
[*] The American Jobs Act.
[This is Truman's kitchen and Teddy's stick or carrying a lever but no pit bully.]
[Sorting it out: It was Eric Cantor who accused the President of politics over legislating. That is a ridiculous line of argument. As someone said about the market operating on society, like Siamese Twins performing brain surgery on themselves. But taking it to the bank or kitchen or pulpit,(the ridiculus line that is), the answer is in one word. VOTE! Up or down, package or separately, limit the filibuster, use reconciliation, WHATEVER! A vote is taking a stand. Take it and run on it, not from it. BUT THEN WE HAVE THE MESSAGE TO GET THROUGH THE MESS AGE OF THE MEDIA, not even punning on ledership. The American Jobs Act did not get voted down, it failed a cloture vote(50-49). That means that even if three more Democrats had voted with the rest, it would have been 53-46, but it takes 60 votes people!]
(10-17-11 or change: added sub-heading with links only)
Was it Cant or Bane or, who said such.
Well, I paraphrase, but it was an attack on President Obama and the American Jobs Act. The idea that he was playing politics by giving them a jobs plan, while it is the legislature's job to create legislation. Sure there is a disagreement as to what creates jobs, but there should be no disagreement that it is legislation and it is political.
Plan B? Walking the Plank? Take up or down votes:
If Republicans want to walk the talk, of Where are the Jobs?* Then vote on every last one of these, as well as the American Jobs Act[*], and see who will be left on the ship of fools.
[*] The American Jobs Act.
[This is Truman's kitchen and Teddy's stick or carrying a lever but no pit bully.]
[Sorting it out: It was Eric Cantor who accused the President of politics over legislating. That is a ridiculous line of argument. As someone said about the market operating on society, like Siamese Twins performing brain surgery on themselves. But taking it to the bank or kitchen or pulpit,(the ridiculus line that is), the answer is in one word. VOTE! Up or down, package or separately, limit the filibuster, use reconciliation, WHATEVER! A vote is taking a stand. Take it and run on it, not from it. BUT THEN WE HAVE THE MESSAGE TO GET THROUGH THE MESS AGE OF THE MEDIA, not even punning on ledership. The American Jobs Act did not get voted down, it failed a cloture vote(50-49). That means that even if three more Democrats had voted with the rest, it would have been 53-46, but it takes 60 votes people!]
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Sum would cheer...
the* death of Keynesian Economics, but a super Congress? Compromise is the art of not making anyone truly happy. Not to mention metaphor happy, or blossom.
[8-1-11: Debt Deal[!]
OurFuture.org , The White House, Paul Krugman, AmericanProgress.org
Winner?
Obama(& Bane Or)
and Compromise & Filibuster
(The Table and Partisanship).
Loser?
The country
and the economy.
Not to mention:
O
'N[!]
Joe.]
[*]pun will lose
[Re: The Table, with Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd(paraphrased)...those who oppose the deal will roar in primaries not in the general] that puts the sword of Damocles on the people and in their votes.]
[My sum mary: the sum will cheer...BULLY[!]
[And some will whine. EXTREME RHETORIC ALERT for link one of the previous three. While in all actuality, I can agree that people are dying, and there are forces alligned against the common good to blame, I cannot use the Hitler analogy that LaRouche utilizes, though the results do border on treason, it is for the people to decide not a determination that can be legally formed. Glass-Steagall is probably one solution, and the offensive PDF probably summarizes the deal accurately, and the only good thing that can come from this hyper-rhetoric is if it works, but it should not make too many people happy that it does. There is also something about the table which links what seems to be a common cause of both La Rouche and Tea Party supporters(at least of the more pragmatic and incremental Libertarian strain).]
[Process in context[!]? Right On!]
[Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]
[8-1-11: Debt Deal[!]
OurFuture.org , The White House, Paul Krugman, AmericanProgress.org
Winner?
Obama(& Bane Or)
and Compromise & Filibuster
(The Table and Partisanship).
Loser?
The country
and the economy.
Not to mention:
O
'N[!]
Joe.]
[*]pun will lose
[Re: The Table, with Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd(paraphrased)...those who oppose the deal will roar in primaries not in the general] that puts the sword of Damocles on the people and in their votes.]
[My sum mary: the sum will cheer...BULLY[!]
[And some will whine. EXTREME RHETORIC ALERT for link one of the previous three. While in all actuality, I can agree that people are dying, and there are forces alligned against the common good to blame, I cannot use the Hitler analogy that LaRouche utilizes, though the results do border on treason, it is for the people to decide not a determination that can be legally formed. Glass-Steagall is probably one solution, and the offensive PDF probably summarizes the deal accurately, and the only good thing that can come from this hyper-rhetoric is if it works, but it should not make too many people happy that it does. There is also something about the table which links what seems to be a common cause of both La Rouche and Tea Party supporters(at least of the more pragmatic and incremental Libertarian strain).]
[Process in context[!]? Right On!]
[Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Bane-R-Us!
The Commercial 4,^ the Capitalization Crowd.*
[The Etch-A-Sketch is sold by Toys-R-Us which is owned by Bain Capital^. The Ohio Art Company product was originally a French^ idea^, renamed in American production, now made in China^.]
^ 3-22-12 bold and # alteration " for" clarity "," and links added.
Monday, September 13, 2010
Bane(Or) Change
[11-17-11 Update Labels]
I guess my chant was heard. But it is not substantial.
There are still three ways of looking at it.
Boehner Change(noun) = debt up, government down
Boehner Change(verb) = nuanced no
Bane or Change(choice) = Reverse or Drive
Might he be bending to the mighty Dem mo'.
Then there is the False flag of divisiveness or moderation?
A pre-curse-or-Y look at narrative? Gingrich supports colonialism**, and in conjunction with Blair, confirms the narrative, the U.S. is more than* patronizing or condescending to the world. I prefer the practical, incremental and political nuances. I feel that there is a major difference in the diplomacy and strategy in the Middle East, compared to the Bush Rumsfeld Cheney unified blame 1% solution.
*[bold irony] It is difficult to balance our national security with national politics in the aim of international justice, let alone diplomacy. Congress in the name of the people must play an important part in the checks and balances as well as the separation of powers. It is a lot easier to say make it so, or make it no, than to make progress. [Segue in time.]
** emphasis "precursory" yet that is the Blair which
projection in the academic twilight*** zone.
*** Gingrich and D'Souza are scary academics
[Speaking of academic lore and narrative not to mention bait and switch.]
I guess my chant was heard. But it is not substantial.
There are still three ways of looking at it.
Boehner Change(noun) = debt up, government down
Boehner Change(verb) = nuanced no
Bane or Change(choice) = Reverse or Drive
Might he be bending to the mighty Dem mo'.
Then there is the False flag of divisiveness or moderation?
A pre-curse-or-Y look at narrative? Gingrich supports colonialism**, and in conjunction with Blair, confirms the narrative, the U.S. is more than* patronizing or condescending to the world. I prefer the practical, incremental and political nuances. I feel that there is a major difference in the diplomacy and strategy in the Middle East, compared to the Bush Rumsfeld Cheney unified blame 1% solution.
*[bold irony] It is difficult to balance our national security with national politics in the aim of international justice, let alone diplomacy. Congress in the name of the people must play an important part in the checks and balances as well as the separation of powers. It is a lot easier to say make it so, or make it no, than to make progress. [Segue in time.]
** emphasis "precursory" yet that is the Blair which
projection in the academic twilight*** zone.
*** Gingrich and D'Souza are scary academics
[Speaking of academic lore and narrative not to mention bait and switch.]
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
FB Wisecrack
Climb8 Change: Con Census/Con Science CRE8's
Hyperbola, Hyperbole, Ebola? Red Cross = Fear
Commune-I-cations: verbal, numeral, graphical.
Ge-O-Metrics, Geo-Me-trics, Boehner, Bane or...
NOW: *
earlier
L8r/ cap it u-l8?
Calm Eddy? Bane or Rove or suit.
Hyperbola, Hyperbole, Ebola? Red Cross = Fear
Commune-I-cations: verbal, numeral, graphical.
Ge-O-Metrics, Geo-Me-trics, Boehner, Bane or...
NOW: *
earlier
L8r/ cap it u-l8?
Calm Eddy? Bane or Rove or suit.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Ryan/Romney run from Ryan plan..
Ryan runs from own plan endorsed by Romney.
Not Exactly.
The lies and hypocrisy know no pail.
Here is to Thomas Roberts. (Not... Today)*
*Links scrolling up.
(i.e. reverse order)
Rachel Maddow: Shrug Life **
Morning Joe: Romney "hate"/"chains" Biden
Today: Reince Priebus "blood"
Today: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Ryan Obama Pick?
Thomas Roberts under "Here". Who is Paul Ryan?
--
The Ed Show: unchained memory
**[?]
The Ed Show: Romney Medicare Lies
The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***
Lean Forward? Or go back. Ryan Fiscal Conservative?
TheLiaisonReport: Wikileaks Ryan
Lean Forward(or back [FOX] to Morning Joe) Cuts and Run.
The Last Word: Romney and Ryan run from Romney Plan
** Maddow Seg-way
***[Smoking Gun: Ryan votes against stimulus, says it works and takes funds for state.]
[The E Pit o'me of Nuance or Flip-Flop.(in reference to above layout, links and asterisks.]
[And this AM: Ryan runs from Wonk and Partisanship. That is a hoot, since he was on the BS Panel(Bowles-Simpson). Reminds me of Saving Pirate Ryan, and "going postal". The USPS(congressional failure) is the Iron Knee to Romney/Ryan I Ron Knee, Funding Bane Or...
(Note: Bane/Bain Boehner confluance and bracket of "Funding"(...)"Or" or Mitt Rob Me. The USPS is not going broke, anymore than the government is going broke, Republicans are breaking it by running their plan which ironically in moderation would solve so many problems. i.e. investment. But they are over-investing in the pension plan and at the same time hoping to privatise it. Won't that be a boon?) In proper context, pirates were a government program. Speaking of hole in the Hart.(AM)]
[See bold book ends: Shrug Life /The Last Word. Not exactly.]
[A last clip (Jon Stewart on The Cycle!) And the pie chart of fiscal irresponsibility does not even include the flip-flop of going austere and focusing on cutting the debt while cutting taxes as soon as the Republicans no longer led.]
Not Exactly.
The lies and hypocrisy know no pail.
Here is to Thomas Roberts. (Not... Today)*
*Links scrolling up.
(i.e. reverse order)
Rachel Maddow: Shrug Life **
Morning Joe: Romney "hate"/"chains" Biden
Today: Reince Priebus "blood"
Today: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Ryan Obama Pick?
Thomas Roberts under "Here". Who is Paul Ryan?
--
The Ed Show: unchained memory
**[?]
The Ed Show: Romney Medicare Lies
The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***
Lean Forward? Or go back. Ryan Fiscal Conservative?
TheLiaisonReport: Wikileaks Ryan
Lean Forward(or back [FOX] to Morning Joe) Cuts and Run.
The Last Word: Romney and Ryan run from Romney Plan
** Maddow Seg-way
***[Smoking Gun: Ryan votes against stimulus, says it works and takes funds for state.]
[The E Pit o'me of Nuance or Flip-Flop.(in reference to above layout, links and asterisks.]
[And this AM: Ryan runs from Wonk and Partisanship. That is a hoot, since he was on the BS Panel(Bowles-Simpson). Reminds me of Saving Pirate Ryan, and "going postal". The USPS(congressional failure) is the Iron Knee to Romney/Ryan I Ron Knee, Funding Bane Or...
(Note: Bane/Bain Boehner confluance and bracket of "Funding"(...)"Or" or Mitt Rob Me. The USPS is not going broke, anymore than the government is going broke, Republicans are breaking it by running their plan which ironically in moderation would solve so many problems. i.e. investment. But they are over-investing in the pension plan and at the same time hoping to privatise it. Won't that be a boon?) In proper context, pirates were a government program. Speaking of hole in the Hart.(AM)]
[See bold book ends: Shrug Life /The Last Word. Not exactly.]
[A last clip (Jon Stewart on The Cycle!) And the pie chart of fiscal irresponsibility does not even include the flip-flop of going austere and focusing on cutting the debt while cutting taxes as soon as the Republicans no longer led.]
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Local Politics
2012 General Election Endorsements
SCROLL DOWN FOR LOCAL ENDORSEMENTS
[INCONVENIENT EDIT: BOTTOM LINE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES*. (i.e. I would like to have noted the follow up at the end of this Endorsement List.) I would also like to have added that no party or candidate is responsible for my obtusity**, tan gents or bane oars. ***]
* something about the protocol of cut and paste does not allow me to place this I.E. and asterisk at the bottom of this post. But this long and winding road, is about the ditch and the drive or...
** posted 10-29-12 (i.e. [!] ? )
*** No Apologies Tour
SCROLL DOWN FOR LOCAL ENDORSEMENTS
[INCONVENIENT EDIT: BOTTOM LINE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES*. (i.e. I would like to have noted the follow up at the end of this Endorsement List.) I would also like to have added that no party or candidate is responsible for my obtusity**, tan gents or bane oars. ***]
* something about the protocol of cut and paste does not allow me to place this I.E. and asterisk at the bottom of this post. But this long and winding road, is about the ditch and the drive or...
** posted 10-29-12 (i.e. [!] ? )
*** No Apologies Tour
|
|
| YES |
| NO |
|
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Updates
[under construction]
Not Fully Read Yet
[Slipping this behind previous post.]
Inter-related updates to be added.
Belated Breaking News (Blair/Rose/Gingrich)
Bane(or) Change(D'Souza Chant)
Three Clauses for (Freud)
Let Me Finish (Hardball Panel)
I'm not even (image one)
Still haven't (B partied)
Updates(this post)(see Stockman)
Off the Charts[9-17-10: Tangent-Ribble-Insert/Stay the Comity/Under the Radar]
[footnote: see first link above @31m 40s] top5%earners=top40%spending but we are talking only top 1%, nobody @NBC corrected the CNBC reporter, despite making good points. ("curious about studies" "moody's" and stocks.)]
Not Fully Read Yet
[Slipping this behind previous post.]
Inter-related updates to be added.
Belated Breaking News (Blair/Rose/Gingrich)
Bane(or) Change(D'Souza Chant)
Three Clauses for (Freud)
Let Me Finish (Hardball Panel)
I'm not even (image one)
Still haven't (B partied)
Updates(this post)(see Stockman)
Off the Charts[9-17-10: Tangent-Ribble-Insert/Stay the Comity/Under the Radar]
[footnote: see first link above @31m 40s] top5%earners=top40%spending but we are talking only top 1%, nobody @NBC corrected the CNBC reporter, despite making good points. ("curious about studies" "moody's" and stocks.)]
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Re:Focus
TIME is not on anyone's side.
(NFRY)
related links : Joe Klein
Paralysis Rules
One for All and All for One
Is Romney a Realist or an Idealist?
Paul Ryan's Grand Vision
The Trouble with Simpson-Bowles
(fn) not yet
[Re-visit ! ?]
[Re:Boot ?]
[Let her role ?^^ ]
AM ?
NOW ?
Mitt-matic ?
Cheese US ?
Or Bane^ ? !
Or Diploma See!
^ The Best Defense(Mine'd Hive?)
^^ But a blimp[!] The Mark Leder Twain.
[Fog of Math!?]
[Brass Balls? Or Dorothy's Slippers?]
(NFRY)
related links : Joe Klein
Paralysis Rules
One for All and All for One
Is Romney a Realist or an Idealist?
Paul Ryan's Grand Vision
The Trouble with Simpson-Bowles
(fn) not yet
[Re-visit ! ?]
[Re:Boot ?]
[Let her role ?^^ ]
AM ?
NOW ?
Mitt-matic ?
Cheese US ?
Or Bane^ ? !
Or Diploma See!
^ The Best Defense(Mine'd Hive?)
^^ But a blimp[!] The Mark Leder Twain.
[Fog of Math!?]
[Brass Balls? Or Dorothy's Slippers?]
Monday, January 07, 2013
Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?
Re: The Cycle***
In your(1) Facebook**, or post something^^ or other.*
*Lede or Ship(saved in draft)
**anacronyism/acronomiters(ditto) and tangents /[(Re:(fn)]
i.e. Heading lost in the process.
*** Bazinga!(c-aster risks)
[Pred-Haidt?]
[Post whatism is the key to the lost heading above.]
[Sea-#PO aka C-uncap-3PO: Ouch! That's the ticket! Speaking of rise/run: War is a last resort, and some people don't know a resort from a hole in the ground.]
The Cycle^ File ? *or*not*
[^ post "don't ask don't tell"(not to mention?[!])
^^ scroll over ]
Note Labels: Saved in Draft, Under Construction...ostensibly complete.
[Pregame Gut Check]
[Post Game Re-Cap: Tide Rolls.]
1-8-13 See what the gut gives us? (Tuesday Morning quarter-backing?) Our Lady of little faith, see "mistakes" crack, under Rolls. While the Crimson Tide rolled, it was certainly arising, with an un-named tune floating in my head.
(1) links inserted 1-8-13 Our Story / Morning Joe?(2) / Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?
(speaking of Up Swift Creak: Bane Or for Haggle?)
In your(1) Facebook**, or post something^^ or other.*
*Lede or Ship(saved in draft)
**anacronyism/acronomiters(ditto) and tangents /[(Re:(fn)]
i.e. Heading lost in the process.
*** Bazinga!(c-aster risks)
[Pred-Haidt?]
[Post whatism is the key to the lost heading above.]
[Sea-#PO aka C-uncap-3PO: Ouch! That's the ticket! Speaking of rise/run: War is a last resort, and some people don't know a resort from a hole in the ground.]
The Cycle^ File ? *or*not*
[^ post "don't ask don't tell"(not to mention?[!])
^^ scroll over ]
Note Labels: Saved in Draft, Under Construction...ostensibly complete.
[Pregame Gut Check]
[Post Game Re-Cap: Tide Rolls.]
1-8-13 See what the gut gives us? (Tuesday Morning quarter-backing?) Our Lady of little faith, see "mistakes" crack, under Rolls. While the Crimson Tide rolled, it was certainly arising, with an un-named tune floating in my head.
(1) links inserted 1-8-13 Our Story / Morning Joe?(2) / Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?
(speaking of Up Swift Creak: Bane Or for Haggle?)
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
One Take Over The Line
I think Ted Nugent may have walked the line of nuance better.
Lawrence filled in a "not so veiled suggestion" that Ted may have avoided. I am not defending hateful and ugly hyperbole or other extremely inaccurate characterizations made by Nugent, but he could have been implying that he could not bear to live under an Obama administration or would be persecuted for his speech. Not that he would commit suicide, I just hate to play with Nugent's cause and effect deficiency.
(Romneys double down: pre-buttal)
Bane or Double Down, Or Boehner Double Down?]
Thursday, September 09, 2010
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Post Election
88 Keys !
That is 44 x* 2 ?
The energy was amazing!
Now for cracking the code, or my Maddowian reference**(knock on wood), but I will leave it to Paul Harvey. The rest of the story. There is Romnesia and there is the Arithmatic.
Something Too Point Oh? Or Owe? Two out of three be bad branches.
Speaking of Maddow and the gang(Ed, Al, Lawrence, etc) I can only weave so much ! ***
* arrived late, left early, but got a pic with Norm, won a book, and booked.
** it was noisy, I fumbled my words, but we R R now Beyond the Norm.
*** doe$ that dog hunt? (I had to parse my inserts carefully[!])
[Conn, Kennedy, Bane Or(Tan Gent)]
[Bottom Line: Mr. President! Begin with your budget^ and your jobs bill on the table, before any grand B.S. ]
^ You know, the one that Romney said was part of everything that you had your way.
11-9-12 (update) Xfinity #9
11-22-12 [C-VC]
12-7-12 update: [listening to AM1090 online,
the following pic scrolled by as the 1st of 5 from 88Keys.
FYI, later scroll expanded to 240 or so pics.]
That is 44 x* 2 ?
The energy was amazing!
Now for cracking the code, or my Maddowian reference**(knock on wood), but I will leave it to Paul Harvey. The rest of the story. There is Romnesia and there is the Arithmatic.
Something Too Point Oh? Or Owe? Two out of three be bad branches.
Speaking of Maddow and the gang(Ed, Al, Lawrence, etc) I can only weave so much ! ***
* arrived late, left early, but got a pic with Norm, won a book, and booked.
** it was noisy, I fumbled my words, but we R R now Beyond the Norm.
*** doe$ that dog hunt? (I had to parse my inserts carefully[!])
[Conn, Kennedy, Bane Or(Tan Gent)]
[Bottom Line: Mr. President! Begin with your budget^ and your jobs bill on the table, before any grand B.S. ]
^ You know, the one that Romney said was part of everything that you had your way.
11-9-12 (update) Xfinity #9
11-22-12 [C-VC]
12-7-12 update: [listening to AM1090 online,
the following pic scrolled by as the 1st of 5 from 88Keys.
FYI, later scroll expanded to 240 or so pics.]
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Nadir
or Bane or...
Enhanced State of the Union,
Republican Response,
and the Third Way?**
With minimum of rhetoric I have filtered of sorts. Boy, was it hard work! Googling* is not easy. I tried to find "fair and balanced" sources, but these
were the ones I chose to settle on. There is more than irony in the way the searches worked, or is there? Some might call it a conspiracy. But others might wish for a 4th dimension.
* or any search engine depending on the words chosen
(and original intent) as original viewing was CNN but sometimes it is not just me.
** 1-26-11
[1-26-11 Woof! Ratings are now in for the SOTU, and here are two ecumenical references. Rachel Maddow, a "prayer for the free-market" from as Joe Scarborough put it "the Cardinal". Who let the CEO's out! Speaking of "genre" note the connection to CNN. My bad, I can't located any embedded references in by blog to a recent Republican Debate sponsored by CNN, but it may be there somewhere. But this does link to the question of the genre of the networks.]
Enhanced State of the Union,
Republican Response,
and the Third Way?**
With minimum of rhetoric I have filtered of sorts. Boy, was it hard work! Googling* is not easy. I tried to find "fair and balanced" sources, but these
were the ones I chose to settle on. There is more than irony in the way the searches worked, or is there? Some might call it a conspiracy. But others might wish for a 4th dimension.
* or any search engine depending on the words chosen
(and original intent) as original viewing was CNN but sometimes it is not just me.
** 1-26-11
[1-26-11 Woof! Ratings are now in for the SOTU, and here are two ecumenical references. Rachel Maddow, a "prayer for the free-market" from as Joe Scarborough put it "the Cardinal". Who let the CEO's out! Speaking of "genre" note the connection to CNN. My bad, I can't located any embedded references in by blog to a recent Republican Debate sponsored by CNN, but it may be there somewhere. But this does link to the question of the genre of the networks.]
Thursday, February 09, 2012
War on Walls?
[Home on Derange?]
but Hard Ball had a guest that I will undertow.
Bane or Explained.
(note bracketed anachronism: pre-post'er us rhetorical ramble.)
^^The Last Word
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)